San Jose Short Sale Agent: Silicon Valley Foreclosure Prevention Specialists

Here is an open letter from CAR’s president, Beth Peerce, discussing the need to get lawmakers and other involved parties to create a more standardized short sale process.  It is a good explanation of the challenges that stand in the way of getting a short sale approved.

Fannie Mae will suspend foreclosure evictions from Dec. 20 through Jan. 3, 2011.  Freddie Mac already made its announcement.

At least the GSEs are showing some compassion during the Holidays.

http://www.housingwire.com/2010/12/06/fannie-mae-to-suspend-foreclosure-evictions-for-the-holidays

I get upset when people don’t try their best.  I realize everyone is different and has different personalities, but we, as Realtors, are all in the business of representing the best interests of our clients.  As Realtors, we have a fiduciary duty to our clients: this means we are to put client’s interest ahead of our own.  We must do our best for our clients.  I’ve heard too many Realtors cave into the lenders without putting up much of a fight.

With the economy still in its anemic state and unemployment level still hovering near historic high of 10% (11.5% here in Silicon Valley), the prospect of depleting the inventory of distressed properties in the immediate future does not seem feasible.  The high level of unemployment and implementation of HAFA with the support of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac means the next few years will be busy years for short sale.

If, you therefore, choose to make a living helping distressed homeowners fight foreclosures, then by all means go out and fight for them because they need all the assistance you can provide.  This often time means pushing on even when the lenders say no or put up road blocks in your path.  The negotiators working for lenders are not highly compensated and are often over-worked, so they simply do not care and are often willing to send homeowners into foreclosure because of minor technicalities.   Some will help out homeowners by going out of their way to help your clients, most will not.  It’s the nature of the bureaucratic systems in which they work.  It doesn’t mean they are bad people, it just means there is little or no incentive for them to go out beyond what is expected of them.  After all, they work for organizations that engage in semi-deceptive practices like dual track foreclosures.  So it is up to us, the Realtors to step up and earn our commissions.

As a San Jose Short Sale Agent, I recently received a call from an attorney friend of mine who wanted me to help his client because the East Coast lender/servicer denied their loan modification request and would not agree to extend a trustee sale which was scheduled some three weeks out.   He got tired of dealing with this lender and wanted to know if I could get the sale date extended and complete a short sale.  Three weeks to stop a foreclosure was a tall order, but I thought I could help.

Getting a bona fide buyer took longer than I anticipated and we had only one week left before the scheduled trustee sale.  I immediately contacted the lender to advise them we had a solid offer and that I had just submitted a short sale packet.  The curt response I got was that their investor had a policy not to extend Trustee sales unless the short sale packets were submitted at least 10 days prior to the sale date: I was three days too late. She would not even consider looking at the offer or the packet. 

I had worked too hard during the past two weeks to simply be told that due to some arbitrary deadline; my clients were going to be thrown out in the street when we had a perfectly good buyer wanting to purchase their home.   I escalated the matter to the negotiator’s supervisor.  She simply reiterated their investor’s policy and told me there was nothing she could do.  I wasn’t going to be stopped by these bureaucrats who didn’t want to lift a finger.  I searched the internet and found the Corporate Communication Director’s contact information.  This time, I was going to use my ace card: my client’s hardship was his wife’s cancer. While she was receiving treatment, she eventually lost her job and the second income which was required to meet their mortgage obligations.

By the time I got the number and the email address (they are in the East Coast), the office was closed, but I left a voicemail and sent an email explaining my situation and that I would contact the local media and explain that the big East Coast lender, because of an arbitrary deadline and because it was inconvenient, would rather throw a cancer victim out into the street, even where there is a willing bona fide buyer, because we missed an arbitrary deadline by three days!   I was not going to let my clients get thrown out into the streets when we had a willing buyer.

The following afternoon, I got a call from the executive office.   They were more receptive and cooperative then the loss mitigation department employees.  The helpful woman said she would get in touch with the appropriate person at the loss mitigation department and do everything she could to get an extension on the sale date.

The next day, I got a call from someone who was a VP at loss mitigation, she began to tell me that the sale date could not be extended because it was the investor’s policy and therefore, they could not deviate from it and began to tell me all the reasons why her hands were tied.  This was a completely different response than the woman from the executive office.

I wasn’t going to simply accept her explanation, I simply would not accept that they had zero influence in extending the trustee sale; I didn’t fall off a turnip truck yesterday.  I called the executive office and again threatened to call the local consumer affairs reporter.  This time the helpful lady told me to disregard what I was told by the loss mitigation employee because she was going to pull strings and get it done.  She asked me to trust her and to call the attorney service the next day and confirm for myself that the extension was granted.  I had no choice as we were down to four days before the sale date.  I called the attorney service the next morning and got the news I was waiting for: we received a 60 days extension.

Between the attorney friend and myself, we were told on four different occasions that the trustee sale could not be extended.  They were simply refusing to lift their fingers to help out the borrower.  I had no choice but to refuse to accept their answers because doing so  would mean that my clients would literally be thrown out into the street when we had a willing buyer to take their home.   I was not proud of exploiting my client’s cancer condition, but I had to protect their interest by any means necessary.  In the end we persevered because I refused to listen to them when they told me no.   I guess I am hard headed in that way; but my clients are thankful and that is good enough for me.

The two GSEs (Government Sponsored Enterprise) Fannie and Freddie Mac have tremendous impact on the housing industry.  Unfortunately, they also have in their portfolios, a lot of distressed loans where homeowners are severely under-water and do not know what to do.

They have attempted to deal with the situation by providing better options like short sales and deed in lieu programs.  As with any government programs, there is a lot of bureaucracy, so to streamline the process and have one website where the homeowners can obtain all of the options available for a Fannie Mae loan, the former has created this website.

www.knowyouroptions.com

It is a one stop shop to learn about all of your options if you have a Fannie Mae loan.

Freddie Mac still has not announced their own website, but these two organizations often operate in unison, so it would not be a big surprise to see it announce a similar website in the near future.

I get a lot of questions posed to me about short sale and foreclosures. An interesting one was posed to me recently.  “How much will a foreclosure cost me?”

I had to really think about this question.  Sure the standard answer about the difference in being able to obtain a loan in the future with Fannie Mae being 2 years vs. 5 years and the FICO score dropping by up to 250 points came to mind.  However, I was thinking that question was asking for a quantifiable number.  How could I quantify the cost of a foreclosure?

I spoke with my loan broker and decided to see what the actual cost would be by comparing someone obtaining a loan pre-foreclosure and then post-foreclosure.

Let us assume an individual has a FICO score of 750 and wants to buy a home for $500,000 with 20% down; so he would be borrowing $400,000.  By running the FICO score through the Fannie Mae guidelines, this individual can obtain a 30 year fixed loan at 4.735 % and have a monthly mortgage payment of $1,997 as of 7/15/2010.

Let’s assume that same individual had gone trough a foreclosure and had taken a 250 point hit on his FICO score.  What would the “cost difference” be for him if he wanted to obtain a loan to buy a house today?

First, any individual with less than a FICO score of 620 cannot qualify to borrow from traditional lenders; the only option available to such a person would be the hard money arena or private lenders.

Private lenders require down payments of 20% , but more like 30-40% .  They are also short term loans, so you would only be able to borrow for 5 years or less, you would have to make other arrangements after that point or build up your FICO to the point where you would be able to qualify for a traditional loan.  But for easy comparison’s sake, we will ignore those two important facts, since there is no other alternative funding method. Let’s assume an individual is able to qualify for a loan of $400,000 after a foreclosure.

After checking with one of her private money lenders, my loan broker came back and told me a private money lender would charge 10% to lend $400,000.   The monthly payment on that loan would be $3,510!

How much will a foreclosure cost?  About $1,510 per month, by my calculations.

Please don’t write to me, pointing out all the errors in my unscientific reasoning.  This was a simplistic exercise trying to somehow quantify the damage to visualize the loss a person may suffer.

Today, Fannie Mae announced how it would deal with strategic defaulters: they will be punished by being unable to qualify for a loan for up to 7 years through Fannie Mae and the latter will reserve the right to take legal action to recoup the losses in states that permit deficiency judgments (not the case in California).  The line has been drawn in the sand.

Strategic defaulters, or those borrowers who have the financial ability to pay their mortgages but who choose not to and walk away because the value of their homes are underwater, are becoming a big problem for banks as the stigma is becoming less and less meaningful and the distressed properties market is ever increasing.   One study puts strategic default at 1/3 of all defaults which eventually lead to foreclosures.

Fannie Mae is addressing a big problem for itself and trying to force strategic defaulters to think twice before walking away from their mortgage obligations.  It’s a perfectly understandable move on its part as it is trying to do potential future damage control.   This reason is also why it has agreed to participate in the HAFA program guideline to encourage negotiated and approved short sales rather than have homeowners simply walk away. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have figured out it is better to work with the distressed borrowers and, for those who qualify, work out an agreed short sale resolution rather than have the property foreclose, as the loss to them will be significantly greater in the end. They are simply engaging in good business practices by mitigating their loss.

For those of you who have been following HAFA, one thing that bothered most people was the fact that the large GSEs Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were not participating in the HAFA program.  Well, as of June 1, that is no longer the case.  Both Fannie and Freddie have announced they will implement their own version of HAFA starting August 1, 2010. Like the private sector’s  HAFA program, the program will end on December 31, 2012.

However, some of the major differences offered by the new Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac HAFA programs include, but are not limited to:

- Both institutions will pay the servicer a $2,200 incentive fee for successful short sales
- Both institutions will pay the servicer a $1,500 incentive fee for all successful DILs
- The Deed for Lease (D4L) is available for borrowers who request and are approved to remain in the property following a successful DIL

The specific details on these programs are listed in their websites.  eFannieMae.com andFreddie Mac Bulletin.

What does this latest move mean?  It simply means that with the two large Government Sponsored Enterprises (GSE) now on board with HAFA, the short sale process and its effect on how the process will be handled in the future is now complete.  The days of lenders dragging their feet and making up their own rules on how short sales will be processed and approved is over now (theoretically, at least).  Everyone will have the same process by which to abide.

As we come to the final part of the series, and have learned about the details and the eligibility of the HAFA program; we have learned that it is beneficial to the homeowner who cannot qualify for loan modifications.  And because the lenders typically will net more through a short sale than foreclosure, it makes financial sense for them to participate, especially in conjunction with the bonus components which have increase dramatically as of March 26, 2010.

So without further adieu, the list of lenders and servicers who have agreed to participate with the HAFA program are posted below.  For the full detailed list, please click on the final link below.

Who is Supporting HAFA?

Lender and loan servicers participating in HAFA must have signed a servicer participation agreement with Fannie Mae – the program administrator and financial agent representing the United States in this case – to participate in HAMP by December 31, 2009. Therefore, most lenders are participating. As April 5 approaches, lenders are developing comprehensive programs in order to prepare for the expected flood of applications for short sale agreements and deeds-in-lieu of foreclosure that HAFA will unleash.

Bank of America

• Bank of America announced in March its commitment to participate in HAFA when it activates. It has been preparing for a more streamlined process for months though its support of HAMP.
• Bank of America’s short sale processor Equator has announced the launch of a brand-new best practices software workflow solutions directly related to HAFA^.

Citibank

• Citibank is participating in HAMP which is a requirement for participating in HAFA

GMAC Financial Services

• GMAC has started a program to preemptively contact borrowers who are not eligible for loan modifications under HAMP and offering discussing alternatives through HAFA and claims a three-day turnaround on short sale applications

Lenders Asset Management Corporation (LAMCO)

• LAMCO has been training teams of specialists to support mortgage servicers comply with HAFA and quickly negotiate short sales

Wachovia

• Wachovia is participating in HAMP which is a requirement for participating in HAFA

Wells Fargo

• Wells Fargo is participating in HAMP which is a requirement for participating in HAFA
• Wells Fargo has been ramping up efforts to assist homeowners by actively contacting those who are facing hardships

NATIONAL PARTICIPATING SERVICERS

Currently, the HAFA Program has not been activated. Therefore, there is not yet an official list of participating lenders. Generally speaking, lenders who participate in HAFA are also participating in HAMP. For a full list of servicers participating in HAMP, visit Making Home Affordable’s Participating Servicers List.

HAFA, HAFA, HAFA.  What is it exactly and why are so many people talking about it and why is April 5, 2010 an important date?

For those who have been following the foreclosure prevention solutions like  loan modification and short sales, this  a critical program which will impact their lives in a major way.  This is the Federal Government’s effort into stream lining and standardizing the short sale process for those borrowers who do not qualify for loan modifications through the HAMP  program. The Treasury is obviously concerned about the proliferation of distressed properties in the real estate market and how they affect the overall health of the economy.  April 5, 2010 is when HAFA goes online.

Remember, short sales that do not successfully get approved  end up on the auction block and if they are not sold there, turn up as the neighborhood eye sore in the form of an REO (Bank owned) properties.   If you are a homeowner, the last thing you want is for an REO to turn up on your block as it will set the bottom range of your home price.   Both Short Sales and REOs negatively impact your neighborhood prices, but  short sales often fetch higher selling prices because they typically have homeowners living there and taking care of the  property which means they show better and are in better condition than REOs; the latter are vacant and many times have been vandalized by the homeowners.   REOs are like the black sheeps of the  family that no one will invite to the party.   Everyone’s collective goal is to prevent more REOs from hitting the real estate market.

What is HAFA?

The Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternatives (HAFA) Program is a government-sponsored initiative led by the US Treasury Department assisting all Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP)-eligible homeowners in avoiding foreclosure, specifically through short sales or deeds-in-lieu. First introduced November 30, 2009 in Supplemental Directive 09-09 as part of HAMP, HAFA assists eligible homeowners in quickly and effectively implementing short sales by providing financial incentives to lenders that work in conjunction with HAMP to assist homeowners in need. The program was introduced in part with the intent to remove the stigma from short sales and help keep communities from being destroyed through massive foreclosures. HAFA in its current state is only applicable to conventional-type, non-Governmental Serviced Enterprises (non-GSE) mortgages and therefore does not apply to loans owned or guaranteed with Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. These organizations may have plans to release their own versions of HAFA.

Details of HAFA

HAFA was introduced to simplify and streamline the short sale process. HAFA accomplishes this in the following ways:

• Compliments HAMP by providing viable alternatives for borrowers who are HAMP-eligible
• Utilizes borrower financial and hardship information collected in conjunction with HAMP, eliminating the need for additional eligibility analysis
• Allows the borrower to receive pre-approved short sale terms prior to the property listing
• Prohibits the servicer from requiring, as a condition of approving the short sale, a reduction in the real estate commission agreed upon in the listing agreement
• Requires that borrowers be fully released from future liability for the debt
• Uses standard processes, documents and timeframes
• Provides financial incentives to borrowers, servicers and investors

HAFA provides financial incentives as follows:

• Financial incentives for lenders participating in the program include up to $6,000 (updated March 26, 2010; was previously $3,000) servicing bonus upon completion of a short sale or deed-in-lieu
• Homeowners qualify for $3,000 (updated March 26, 2010; was previously $1,500) in Borrower Relocation Assistance after a short sale or deed-in-lieu has been executed (may classify as taxable income in some cases
• Lenders pay all servicing fees — homeowners suffer zero out-of-pocket expenses

Part 2 of 3 – Who is eligible for HAFA